Sunday, December 22, 2024

Resisting Mass Deportation Under Donald Trump

Share




Activism


/
November 14, 2024

Here in Chicago, we’ve developed effective, grassroots strategies for defending our immigrant communities.

Resisting Mass Deportation Under Donald Trump
Demonstrators protest the deportation of immigrants on March 1, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois.(Scott Olson / Getty Images)

Chicago, Ilinois—In the lead-up to this election, Donald Trump promised the “largest deportation program in American history to get the criminals out.” Although immigrants statistically have some of the lowest rates of criminal activity, for Trump and his associates, all people who have entered the country without proper documentation are criminals. When Trump says he wants to deport criminals, he means every undocumented immigrant in our communities: workers, homeowners, small-business owners, parents, spouses, and children.

Such a massive deportation regime would be devastating for our American communities—large and small—resulting in the separation of families, the closure of businesses, and the hollowing out of entire neighborhoods.

During Trump’s first term in office, he ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in major cities, including cities and counties like our own, which have sanctuary policies. His xenophobic statements and actions caused immense harm to our immigrant communities. Now, as he returns to office on the promise of an even more extensive deportation dragnet, local governments and communities must take bold action to challenge the systems that criminalize our neighbors.

At the core of this resistance is grassroots organizing. We must be prepared to take direct action at the local level to challenge a federal deportation regime. This means continuing and expanding what many communities across the United States did in 2017: enacting comprehensive and robust sanctuary-city policies, organizing neighbors to engage in direct action to protect their immigrant neighbors, and building networks of mutual aid and solidarity.

Current Issue

Cover of November 2024 Issue

Community-based grassroots organizing has been one of the most potent tools for resisting mass deportation. In 2017, communities across the nation, including our own in Chicago, organized deportation defense networks. On Chicago’s Northwest Side, we organized the Community Defense Committee out of the 35th Ward office. We trained hundreds of neighbors on how to identify ICE in our communities and how to engage in nonviolent civil disobedience; we knocked on thousands of doors to inform neighbors of their fundamental constitutional rights and what to do if ICE came to their door, workplace, or neighborhood. In 2025, we must continue this grassroots organizing work, and elected officials who represent immigrant communities must make Know Your Rights education and deportation defense work part of the core constituent service offered by their district offices.

To disrupt Trump’s deportation regime, local and state governments must adopt robust local noncooperation policies with ICE. It is not enough to declare our cities, states, and public institutions as sanctuaries—we must ensure that local and state laws protect undocumented communities from ICE by prohibiting information sharing and collaboration with ICE, including by third-party contractors.

In Chicago, our grassroots organizing to defend our neighbors led to one of the most robust big-city sanctuary-city policies in the nation. The Chicago Police Department is legally barred from working with ICE in any case, with no exceptions. During Trump’s second term, it will be critical to defend such policies already on the books, to expand the number of cities and states that have these policies on their books, and to close loopholes that undermine these policies. For example, while Chicagoland’s Cook County has prohibited public official cooperation with ICE, ICE still targets the county’s undocumented residents through data purchased from third-party data brokers who do business with the county. That’s why the two of us are working to pass No Data for ICE legislation through the County Board of Commissioners.

Like during his last term, Trump is likely to use the threat of withholding federal funding as a cudgel to compel cities and states to abandon their sanctuary policies. Local and state elected officials, and our communities, must prepare to resist this pressure, including explaining and defending the importance of sanctuary policies.

While grassroots organizing for direct action and passing noncooperation policies are crucial to challenging Trump’s deportation regime, mutual aid is an equally important part of the strategy. Mutual aid networks are community-led efforts to meet the needs of undocumented migrants and their families, covering everything from providing food and shelter to offering legal assistance. By providing tangible support, mutual aid not only helps people survive; it also builds solidarity and strengthens community ties. Mutual aid doesn’t just alleviate the immediate suffering caused by deportation policies—it fosters long-term, interdependent relationships within communities, making it harder for the government to target individuals when they have widespread, organized support.

Despite all our efforts, Trump will still succeed in deporting many people from our communities, which is why our mutual aid work must become transnational, helping undocumented immigrants reestablish their lives post-deportation. For example, mutual aid organizers supporting deported individuals should work to ensure that former employers issue the final paychecks owed to their now-deported employee.

Trump is promising more aggressive deportation tactics during his second term. We should believe him, and to throw a wrench in his plans, we must build a broad-based movement that unites neighbors and ties deportation resistance to the larger struggles for racial justice and economic equality. It’s crucial that we stand together, in solidarity, to resist these oppressive policies.

Deportation in the United States is not just an immigration issue; it is a tool of racial and economic control. Resisting deportation is not just about stopping raids or disrupting ICE operations; it is about challenging the deeply entrenched systems of racialized violence and exclusion that define US immigration policy.

The fight against mass deportation is a fight for the dignity and humanity of every immigrant and working person in the United States. In response to Trump’s reelection, the need for bold, grassroots resistance is ever more urgent. Through grassroots organizing, direct action, noncooperation with ICE, and mutual aid, communities can defend immigrants from deportation and begin to dismantle the systems that perpetuate racialized violence. Ultimately, our work to defend our communities from deportation must assert the right of all people to live freely, with dignity and safety, regardless of their immigration status.

By creating networks of care and solidarity, immigrant communities are less reliant on a system that seeks to expel them. These networks become incubators for resistance, where people don’t just survive—they organize.

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Anthony J. Quezada

Anthony J. Quezada represents the Eighth District on the Cook County Board of Commissioners.

Carlos Ramirez-Rosa

Since 2015 Carlos Ramirez-Rosa has been the alderman representing Chicago’s 35th Ward.

More from The Nation

The author speaks at an abortion rally in Nashville, Tennessee, in May 2022.

As we share our truths and witness each other’s, we build unity and community.

Adrianne Wright

Trump Has Won. Now What?

“The Nation” will continue to expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive.

Katrina vanden Heuvel

The logo of “The New York Times” seen displayed on a smartphone.

The Tech Guild has waited over two years for a contract. Its workers will go on strike this Tuesday if management doesn’t agree to key demands.

Thomas Birmingham

Good Luck Finding Legal Representation If You Support Palestine

A law firm dumped me as a client because of my support of students’ right to protest Israel’s actions. I’m far from the only one shut out.

Katherine Franke

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators gather and take to the streets.

The university’s overhauled expressive activity policy has been criticized by both pro-Palestine advocates and student and faculty governing bodies.

StudentNation

/

Gabriel Muñoz






Source link

Read more

Local News